EPA: Refiners will use fuel that doesn’t exist…

If there isn’t enough reason to reform the EPA…

EPA fines oil refiners for failing to use nonexistent biofuel

Question: Do you fill your car’s tank with gasoline that is part cellulosic ethanol, an environment-friendly distillate of wood chips, corn cobs, and switch grass? Let me answer for you: No, you don’t. You couldn’t if you wanted to. Petroleum products blended with cellulosic ethanol aren’t commercially available, because the technology for mass-producing cellulosic ethanol hasn’t been perfected. None of which has stopped the Environmental Protection Agency  from imposing hefty yearly fines on oil refiners. According to the The New York Times, in 2011 automotive fuel producers were assessed $6.8 million in penalties. That amount is expected to climb dramatically this year. Guess who ends up footing the bill for the difference?

This time it is Bush’s fault…

This has got to be the ultimate example of government bureaucracy gone mad. How did it happen? Blame can be divided over the last two administrations. In his 2006 State of the Union Address, George W. Bush promised to “fund additional research in cutting-edge methods of producing ethanol, not just from corn, but from wood chips and stalks or switch grass.” The following year, Bush signed into law the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), which mandates that oil refiners begin blending cellulosic ethanol into their gasoline and diesel products.

You’ll use this imaginary fuel or you’ll pay a penalty..

The “advanced biofuel contribution” under the law was to begin in 2009 at 0.6 billion gallons of cellulosic biomass and rise incrementally, first to 1.35 billion gallons in 2011, then to 2 billion gallons in 2012, and so on. By 2022, 21 billion gallons of fuel pumped into the nation’s cars and trucks was to be cellulosic ethanol.

The law further stipulated that if refiners failed to comply with the EPA mandate, they would pay a penalty.

And while it started under bush, Obama is still wasting money on it…

The only problem with this arrangement was that the grant recipients responsible for coming up with Bush’s “cutting-edge methods of producing ethanol … from wood chips and stalks or switch grass” instead came up empty. In a 2011 report, the National Academy of Sciences concluded that “currently, no commercially viable bio-refineries exist for converting cellulosic biomass to fuel.” The report also noted that the renewable fuel standard “may be an ineffective policy for reducing global greenhouse gas emissions,” since the full life cycle of the fuel, including its transport, could lead to higher emissions than conventional petroleum.

Undaunted, the Obama administration has forged blindly ahead, continuing the elusive search for a technology that will produce cellulosic biomass—at taxpayers’ expense. Since thanks to the EPA mandate we are already paying more at the pump, the American people are truly getting nothing for something.

Perhaps I’ll write a post on what ethanol does to your engines… hint – it ain’t good.

Inherited?

How many times have we heard Obama say that he “inherited” this or that… 100?… 1000?… more? Obama did inherit anything – he begged for it, campaigned for it, lied for it, and then cries about it – last I check he wasn’t George Bush’s son and I’m pretty sure he is not in his will… Obama didn’t inherit anything – he asked for it and over three years on he is still failing to take responsibility.

 

h/t to a unknown photoshopper for this one.

Treating the troops like trash…

Dover mortuary landfill dumping: Congressman asked Pentagon about practice in Sept.

A New Jersey congressman wrote directly to Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta two months ago to seek details about the Dover Air Force Base mortuary’s practice of dumping troops’ cremated body parts in a landfill but says he never received a reply.

The congressman’s letter raises questions about when Panetta learned that the mortuary disposed of cremated portions of remains at the King George County, Va., landfill. Panetta has said he was unaware of the dumping before this week.

Isn’t it funny how nobody knows anything in the Obama administration… Holder doesn’t know about Fast and Furious, Obama didn’t know about Solyndra, Palosi know nothing about nothing etc etc… seems like anytime anything goes to shit in this government nobody knows anything about it.

Rep. Rush Holt (D-N.J.), acting on behalf of a constituent whose husband was killed in Iraq and was prepared for burial by the Dover mortuary, said he sent a letter to Panetta on Sept. 16 “seeking clear and definitive answers” about the mortuary’s landfill practices. Holt said he had raised the issue a few months earlier with the Pentagon’s legislative affairs office but was “frustrated by a failure” to get a full response.

Pentagon press secretary George Little said Friday that Panetta’s office had received Holt’s Sept. 16 correspondence and that staffers “have been working to collect the information required to answer the questions in the congressman’s letter. We will, of course, provide a thorough response as promptly as possible.”

You are shitting me right? Since Sept 16th they have been working on an answer? What? A buy some time while we cover our ass answer?

Air Force officials have said they dumped only cremated fragments or portions of body parts that were unable to be identified at first or were later recovered from the battlefield. Family members had authorized the military to dispose of those portions.

The Air Force said the body parts were cremated, then incinerated, and taken to the landfill by a military contractor. The manner of disposal was not disclosed to relatives of the troops.

Image not disclosing that to the family… I’m sure they’d be OK with sending their kid to the dump.

In his letter to Panetta, Holt asked why the ashes were trucked to the landfill and not interred at Arlington National Cemetery. He also asked whether the human remains had been mixed with incinerated medical waste, and he sought information on which military contractors were responsible.

As of Friday, Holt said, he still had not received answers from Panetta’s office.

Maybe if they ignore it, it will go away – beside the it’s cheaper to just dump them.

“I thought there would be some straightforward explanation that we could get fairly quickly,” Holt said in a telephone interview. “Evidently this has been harder for them to answer.”

This is a Democrat complaining about getting answers out for the government – welcome to our world.

In 2007, Gari-Lynn Smith received her husband’s autopsy report and learned that some remains had not been found in time to include in his casket.

Over the next four years, she tried to find out what happened to those body parts. A Dover mortuary official notified her in April that they had been cremated and taken to the landfill.

How would you like the government to tell you… ‘Oh by the way we took your spouses parts to the dump.’

In addition, Holt criticized the Pentagon for not informing him — at the time of his inquiries this summer — that the Air Force was simultaneously conducting a separate investigation into the Dover mortuary.

The results of that 18-month investigation were made public Tuesday, when federal investigators said they had documented “gross mismanagement” after whistleblowers complained about lost body parts, shoddy inventory controls and lax supervision.

“Gross mismanagement” is a slight understatement.

Panetta has said he was fully briefed about the probe as soon as he took office in July. That investigation, however, did not examine the mortuary’s landfill-dumping.

The defense secretary appointed an independent panel Tuesday to review overall operations at the mortuary. The panel’s leader, former U.S. surgeon general Richard H. Carmona, quit Friday so he instead could run for the Senate. He is seeking an open seat from Arizona.

What a damn minute… if we go back to the top Panetta said he didn’t know about it until this week and now he knew about it the day he took office in July? Well which is it? I smell a lie – but what’s knew with this bunch?

Now understand this didn’t just happen under the Obama administration it started in 2003 so their are a lot of people that need to answer questions and any one apart of this should face some sought of charges light abuse of a corpse.

Pathetic that our government would treat our troops this way – shameful.

The Gaffe Administration…

What’s Up With All the Presidential Gaffes, Anyway?

Big Media doesn’t pay much attention to them, even though Obama makes an amazing number of errors in his public statements.  And I think it’s easy enough to understand why the BM largely ignores them:  to report them all would totally undermine the image of the president to which a surprising number of “reporters” and pundits are wedded:  that of an unusually intelligent and well educated man.

I’ve long said Obama is not nearly as smart has he’d have you believe – he rode the affirmative action wave through Ivy League schools and if any liberal wants to debate that – then please provide me a copy of his transcripts and any scholastic paper he wrote. Can’t do it can you?

Yet someone who tells a crowd in Vienna that his “Austrian” isn’t very good, who tells Marines that he’s pleased to speak to the “Marine Corpse,” and who, just today, said he’d given the Medal of Honor to a survivor from the 10th Mountain Division, when in fact the award was given posthumously, doesn’t fit my definition of a brilliant and cultured man.

I never went to Harvard, hell I’m just a down south hick and yet I knew they spoke German in Austria and to call the Marine’s the Marine Corpse and Navy Corpseman is just inexcusable – my Gawd even Gomer Pyle knew it was the Marine Corps. Pretty sad when Gomer Pyle is smarter.

When you add up all the mistakes he’s made–not slips of the tongue, but real errors in statements and speeches he could read from the ubiquitous teleprompter–they make quite a number.  So what? you may ask.  The answer is that hundreds of people traditionally read the drafts of presidential speeches and statements.  That happens for two good reasons.  First, presidential utterances are instant policy.  It’s hard to walk away from a public statement.  Second, the myriad political appointees want their leader to look good, and they strain to ensure the accuracy of his statements.  Or at least they did when I had first-hand knowledge of such things, now a few years back.

Or the minions working in this administration are just as incompetent and naive as the President.

That would explain today’s embarrassment (embarrassment to us, to the nation–he speaks for us, after all–since he doesn’t seem to suffer embarrassment very often), but it doesn’t explain things like the apology for his lack of fluency in “Austrian” or his lack of knowledge that we have  a Marine Corps (pronounced “core”).  That comes from lousy education, from lack of basic knowledge about the world.  And if I’m right about the small number of administration officials who get to see his words before they’re delivered in public, it tells us that they, too, aren’t properly educated.

What I just said – there is a huge difference in being educated and being smart – I’ve met a amazing number of highly educated idiots, most of them working in higher education (or the government).

It tells us that the president and his trusted advisers are the products of the atrocious, politically correct educational system that’s wrecking the country in so many ways.  And it’s very worrisome.  It’s part of the Orwellian universe that envelops many of our leaders, a universe in which they feel free to simply invent “facts” so long as they fit the emotional and ideological pattern that really matters to the elite.

And these people think they’re the smart guys, and we’re the dummies, even though we know that German is spoken in Vienna, and many of us would be mortified to make a glaring error about an American hero.

I certainly know I’d be embarrassed if I was to exhibit such ignorance on information and facts that would easily qualify as a question on “Are you smarter than a 5th Grader?” and in Obama’s case the answer is no.

The gaffes are important.  They tell us a lot about the nature of our leaders, and it’s not good news.  But it is news…even though it’s not reported as often as it should be, or with the sort of concern the gaffes deserve.

And yet they think Bush, Palin, Cain, Paul and pretty much anyone with an “R” behind their name are stupid.

Racism is in the eye of the liberal…

PMSNBC ask if the following picture is racist…

Breitbart to Bashir: ‘You’re Insinuating I’m Racist Which is What MSNBC Does to Conservatives Every Day’

Reportedly sent in an email by Marilyn Davenport, a tea party activist

So ask ask is this one racist?

I actually had dozens and dozens of Bush-Chimp images to choose from… so is it racist?

Or are the Liberals projecting their own racism because Obama is half Black?

WTF News #11 – Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links

Once again I had to go to the British press to get my news…

Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links

Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, the Libyan rebel leader, has said jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq are on the front lines of the battle against Muammar Gaddafi’s regime.

In an interview with the Italian newspaper Il Sole 24 Ore, Mr al-Hasidi admitted that he had recruited “around 25″ men from the Derna area in eastern Libya to fight against coalition troops in Iraq. Some of them, he said, are “today are on the front lines in Adjabiya”.

Mr al-Hasidi insisted his fighters “are patriots and good Muslims, not terrorists,” but added that the “members of al-Qaeda are also good Muslims and are fighting against the invader”.

So let me get this right… we American’s taxpayers are helping the Libyan rebels who fought against the American military but with al-Qaeda in Iraq and Afghanistan? Is that it? And we’re going to give them weapons and money for what again? Who the hell’s side are we on… ours or theirs?

I still don’t know why Libya matters to us – it’s not the oil for America – we get less than 2% of our oil from them, it’s not for stability in the middle east… good gawd there has never in all of written history been real stability in the middle east. The closest thing the middle east ever had to stability was the Roman Empire and that was done through pure brute force and a unifying Roman culture.

This is all about oil for the EU – American money and Libyan blood for European oil – where is the left? Where is the moral outrage? Where are the protest? Where are the charges of big oil, billionaires and Haliburton? Well?

But it’s not just oil – Libya is a jumping off point for a lot of Africans and Arabs that are migrating (illegally immigrating) to Western Europe – and Western Europe… places like Germany and France would really, really like to stop that… but again – this is our problem, how? I don’t see Pierre and Hans over here on the southern border tossing Jose back over the fence and we know the German know about fences and walls. So what gives, why are we there? Is it Lockerbie? Does it really take over 122 GPS guided Tomahawk cruise missiles to take out one third world despot and we still miss? If it’s Gaddafi then send in one guy who is a good shot and a $2.00 bullet and kill his ass… oh I know it’s a against the rules, it’s against the law – well since when did pesky little thing like the law ever stop the loony left from doing what they want? ObamaCare anyone? Anyone?….  And this is a loony left war after all… can’t blame this one on George W. Bush – I’m sure they will try, but they can’t.

So a parting thought – if Libya is a humanitarian meals on wheels mission why aren’t we in Syria? Darfur? Rwanda? Congo? North Korea? etc etc….just sayin’ what does Libya have they don’t? Hummus?

Is NATO coordinating with rebels in Libya?
Gates: No vital national interest or imminent threat in Libya before Odyssey Dawn

Where’s the beef? Stimulus at 2 years old…

If George Bush had made a bunch of claims and promises after spending nearly a trillion dollars and none of them came true the media would have a real beef with him and rightfully so… Obama made a lot of claims and promises and nearly all of them have failed to materialize and the media says nothing – so where’s the beef?

Stimulus Two Years Later, Networks Ignore Obama’s Failed Job Promise

Where Were Stories about the 8 Percent Promise? Just nine stories out of 589 (less than 2 percent) referred to the unemployment prediction in two years of network news coverage.

Networks Instead Promoted More Stimulus: When the effects of the stimulus plan were discussed, network news shows promoted even more stimulus. ABC’s Bianna Golodryga asked Warren Buffet if he thought unemployment would hit 11 percent to which he said yes. Then, instead of noting that the stimulus failed, she asked if a second stimulus was needed. To this Buffet replied it may be necessary because the first bill “was sort of like taking half a tablet of Viagra.”

Bush Forced to Defend 5 Percent Unemployment: Under the administration of President George W. Bush, negative economic stories were pushed when unemployment was below 5 percent – less than half the number reached after the stimulus passed. CBS’ Dan Rather on Oct. 8, 2004, asked “Tonight, where are the jobs?” yet few stimulus stories have even mentioned Obama’s unemployment prediction.

ABC Was The Worst With Only One Story: ABC “World News” only mentioned the 8 percent prediction one time in nearly two years of coverage, making it the worst of the three networks. Instead ABC credited the stimulus with lower unemployment as reporter Betsy Stark claimed Dec. 4, 2009, when unemployment dropped to 10 percent: “Economists credit the government’s massive stimulus spending with getting the job market to this point.”

CBS Was the Best With a Mere Four Stories: “Evening News” did a better job of reminding viewers of Obama’s promise than ABC and NBC did, but still only mentioned it four times over two years. But unlike others Katie Couric actually brought it up in an interview with Obama on July 21, 2009 and asked him to respond. That was one of the few examples of what the networks should have done more often.

Journalistic hypocrisy? You be the judge…

But wait there’s more…. The White House’s new Beltway Bob – Jay Carney said the Stimulus goals have been met…

WH’s Jay Carney: Stimulus “Goals Have Been Met”

White House press secretary Jay Carney says the Recovery Act added several million jobs and lowered the unemployment rate. According to Carney, the “goals” of the stimulus package “have been met.”

A reporter asked Carney why unemployment is at 9% and not 7%, the percentage projected if the stimulus worked. Carney dismissed the question. “We’ve said repeatedly that we don’t want to relitigate the battles of the past,” Carney told the reporter.

What ever Jay… Obama lied, the economy died.

History will define Obama as a Sociopath.

Just George W. Bush has stated that the clarity of history, time and future generation will define his Presidency so to will it define Obama and I believe it will be defined as one of a sociopath. Trying to set aside my utter dislike of Obama, if we look at his actions and behavior stacked up against the clinical description of a sociopath more widely known today as antisocial personality disorder you will find Obama in every part of the description.

A few days ago I was reading an article in a local magazine called “The Sociopath Revealed” it was just a general article aimed at no one person and that as the title said, revealed the tell tale traits of a clinical sociopath. While I read the article I kept thinking ‘Wow, that’s Obama.” So what is a sociopath anyway?

Here is the article I read, it is a Flash based magazine and the article starts on page 62. (Better get on it they don’t archive their issues and when it’s gone it’s gone.) But being a nice guy I’ve screen captured the article for you to read.

Page 1 and 2 Click to Enlarge

Page 3 Click to Enlarge

If you read that article does it sound like anyone you know? Does it sound like Obama? The article above and the article that follows below are independent of one another and both sound like a autobiography of Obama – it is in fact uncanny just how much of these descriptions fit Obama’s personality to a tee.

I’m not going to cover everyone – you’ll get the point fast enough. I will quote the description of a sociopath and then show something Obama has done or said that fits the description.

Protect yourself from sociopaths Learn to recognize the traits—then stay away

Psychopaths are often witty and articulate. They can be amusing and entertaining conversationalists, ready with a quick and clever comeback, and can tell unlikely but convincing stories that cast themselves in a good light. They can be very effective in presenting themselves well and are often very likable and charming.

Typically, psychopaths attempt to appear experts in sociology, psychiatry, medicine, psychology, philosophy, poetry, literature, art or law. A signpost to this trait is often a smooth lack of concern at being found out that they are not.

Obama is often witty and charming, smiling at you all while stabbing you in the back. They also lie to appear knowledgeable in subject they are not. Example: “Obama got his facts completely wrong. He stated that a surgeon gets paid $50,000 for a leg amputation when, in fact, Medicare pays a surgeon between $740 and $1,140 for a leg amputation.”

Psychopaths have a narcissistic and grossly inflated view of their self-worth and importance, a truly astounding egocentricity and sense of entitlement. They see themselves as the center of the universe, as superior beings who are justified in living according to their own rules.

Really do I need to remind you of the “sea level will recede, the planet will heal” he blabbered in a speech and the fact he so arrogantly pointed out that he won. Example: “President Obama listened to Republican gripes about his stimulus package during a meeting with congressional leaders Friday morning – but he also left no doubt about who’s in charge of these negotiations. “I won,” Obama noted matter-of-factly, according to sources familiar with the conversation.”

Psychopaths are seldom embarrassed about their legal, financial or personal problems. Rather, they see them as temporary setbacks, the results of bad luck, unfaithful friends or an unfair and incompetent system.

Remember Obama said his massive loss in the midterm was not because of him, it was because you were just too stupid to get his grand vision. He didn’t explain things to you in words you simpletons could understand.  Example: “Barack Obama, in an interview with CBS said that he acknowledged his failure to communicate his economic-rescue message to anxious Americans. He did not blame his policies for the loss, but rather the lack of communication with the American people.” Do I really need to remind you of how many speeches he made? No, I didn’t think so.

Psychopaths feel that their abilities will enable them to become anything they want to be. Given the right circumstances—opportunity, luck, willing victims—their grandiosity can pay off spectacularly. For example, the psychopathic entrepreneur “thinks big,” but it’s usually with someone else’s money.

Spread the wealth – trickle up poverty and what’s yours is mine and what’s mine is mine. Obama has spent your money, my money, our kid’s money, our grandkid’s money and generations to come monies. Example: “In the first 19 months of the Obama administration, the federal debt held by the public increased by $2.5260 trillion, which is more than the cumulative total of the national debt held by the public that was amassed by all U.S. presidents from George Washington through Ronald Reagan.”

The feelings of other people are of no concern to psychopaths. Psychopaths view people as little more than objects to be used for their own gratification. The weak and the vulnerable—whom they mock, rather than pity—are favorite targets.

Psychopaths display a general lack of empathy. They are indifferent to the rights and suffering of family members and strangers alike. If they do maintain ties with their spouses or children it is only because they see their family members as possessions, much like their stereos or automobiles.

Because of their inability to appreciate the feelings of others, some psychopaths are capable of behavior that normal people find not only horrific but baffling. For example, they can torture and mutilate their victims with about the same sense of concern that we feel when we carve a turkey for Thanksgiving dinner.

No drama Obama is what they call him which is a misnomer for cold and detached. Example: “Obama’s lack of empathy has been quite apparent in the Arizona immigration situation, in the current appeals for more immediate action in the Gulf, in his hasty appraisal of the “stupid” cops involved in the Gates affair, and in his ongoing indifference to the genuine needs of the besieged state of Israel.”

However, except in movies and books, very few psychopaths commit crimes of this sort. Their callousness typically emerges in less dramatic, though still devastating, ways: parasitically bleeding other people of their possessions, savings and dignity; aggressively doing and taking what they want; shamefully neglecting the physical and emotional welfare of their families; engaging in an unending series of casual, impersonal and trivial sexual relationships; and so forth.

You may remember in 2004 when Obama gave the convention speech and Michelle gave this glowing baby-daddy welcome he ignored her completely when he came out, not to mention him sending them away at the Grant Park speech in January 2009. Then his has repeatedly stated he is going to take from the haves and give to the have-not’s or in other words take from those that produce and give to those that take. Example: “Obama told us he was going to use Congress to redistribute the wealth — explicitly. And he thinks it’s in the Constitution. My friend Steve Schippert tried to call attention to this interview about ten days before the election, but few noticed.”

Lying, deceiving and manipulation are natural talents for psychopaths. Given their glibness and the facility with which they lie, it is not surprising that psychopaths successfully cheat, bilk, defraud, con and manipulate people and have not the slightest compunction about doing so. They are often forthright in describing themselves as con men, hustlers or fraud artists. Their statements often reveal their belief that the world is made up of “givers and takers,” predators and prey, and that it would be very foolish not to exploit the weaknesses of others.

Some of their operations are elaborate and well thought out, whereas others are quite simple: stringing along several women at the same time, or convincing family members and friends that money is needed “to bail me out of a jam.” Whatever the scheme, it is carried off in a cool, self-assured, brazen manner.

The Obama rhetoric around healthcare, stimulus, cap and trade, etc etc ring a bell. It’s all about taking from one and giving to another they and they alone deem more deserving and if they have to lie to get it, so be it. Example: “Obama loves to make up things that are patently untrue, like every economist agrees his $800 billion economic stimulus “has done its job,” the economy “is moving in the right direction,” and the Bush tax cuts caused the trillion dollar deficits.”

Psychopaths seem to suffer a kind of emotional poverty that limits the range and depth of their feelings. While at times they appear cold and unemotional, they are prone to dramatic, shallow and short-lived displays of feeling. Careful observers are left with the impression that they are play-acting and that little is going on below the surface.

Laboratory experiments using biomedical recorders have shown that psychopaths lack the physiological responses normally associated with fear. The significance of this finding is that, for most people, the fear produced by threats of pain or punishment is an unpleasant emotion and a powerful motivator of behavior. Not so with psychopaths; they merrily plunge on, perhaps knowing what might happen but not really caring.

Obama uncaring and detached? NO! Example: “Barack Obama’s salute to the 13 dead from a shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas, was largely unemotional. The most personal part of the speech at today’s memorial service at Fort Hood was a series of anecdotes describing the families and aspirations of each of the victims.”

Psychopaths are unlikely to spend much time weighing the pros and cons of a course of action or considering the possible consequences. “I did it because I felt like it,” is a common response.

More than displays of temper, impulsive acts often result from an aim that plays a central role in most of the psychopath’s behavior: to achieve immediate satisfaction, pleasure or relief. So, family members, employers and co-workers typically find themselves standing around asking themselves what happened—jobs are quit, relationships broken off, plans changed, houses ransacked, people hurt, often for what appears to be little more than a whim.

Psychopaths tend to live day-to-day and to change their plans frequently. They give little serious thought to the future and worry about it even less.

Oh do I really need to link this one? Rushed stimulus, rushed healthcare, rushed everything, record spending and completely ignoring what the American said in protest of slow down, read the bill, stop deficit spending and let’s look at a way to fix it – nope! For Obama it was do it NOW then you’ll see what’s in it and worry about it never.

These descriptions of a sociopath go on and on – but why bore you with all that – suffice to say Barack Hussein Obama is a clinical sociopath with narcissistic personality disorder and I believe history will tell that Obama has a serious mental illness that if not reeled in will destroy a nation.

But don’t take my word for it – what do the doctors say?

A Shrink Asks: What’s Wrong with Obama?

Many people attribute Obama’s oddness to his narcissism. True, Obama has a gargantuan ego, and he is notoriously thin-skinned.

Yet a personality disorder like narcissism does not explain Obama’s strangeness: his giggling while being asked about the economy; his continuing a shout-out rather than announcing the Ft. Hood shootings; or his vacations, golfing, partying and fundraising during the calamitous oil spill.

Take also Obama’s declaring on the “Today Show” that he wants to know whose ass to kick. Consummate narcissists would never stoop to this vulgar display of adolescent machismo.

Obama is flat when passion is needed; he’s aggressive when savvy is required. What’s most worrisome is that Obama doesn’t even realize that his behavior is inappropriate.

So if it’s not just simple narcissism, what is wrong with Obama? Since I’ve never evaluated him, I can’t say for sure. But I can hazard some educated guesses.

If I saw a client as disconnected as him, the first thing I would wonder: Is something wrong with his brain? And I’d consider the following theoretical diagnostic possibilities.

Now the good Doctor goes on to cover a number of scenarios and concludes Obama has antisocial personality disorder – which is more classically known as what? – You guessed it a sociopath.

Along with the brain issues are personality disorders: narcissism, paranoia, passive-aggressiveness. There’s even the possibility of the most destructive character defect of all, an antisocial personality. Untreated abuse can foster antisocial traits, especially among boys.

If my assessment is accurate, what does this mean?

It means that liberals need to wake up and spit out the Kool-Aid…and that conservatives should put aside differences, band together, and elect as many Republicans as possible.

Because Obama will not change. He will not learn from his mistakes. He will not grow and mature from on-the-job experience. In fact, over time, Obama will likely become a more ferocious version of who he is today.

Why? Because this is a damaged person. Obama’s fate was sealed years ago growing up in his strange and poisonous family. Later on, his empty vessel was filled with the hateful bile of men like Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers.

Obama will not evolve; he will not rise to the occasion; he will not become the man he was meant to be. This is for one reason and one reason alone:

He is not capable of it.

Time will tell but my money is on a sociopathic personality – destructive not only to himself and his family but to the country.

Presidental Points

Obama’s Speech

Did you watch Dopey’s speech the other night? No, me neither.

I saw highlights of his speech if you can call it highlights – he looks bored and tired – like he’d rather be shooting hoops- guess he needs a vacation from all of his vacations. Naturally Obama failed to thank Bush or give him any credit for the surge in Iraq – what a classless piece of crap he is. 10,000 bloggers has posted about this so I won’t add to the list. I will say there are people in this world I really don’t like – I mean REALLY don’t like but I go out of my way to say something nice when asked or force to mention them. So I’d think that the President of the United States could muster a little class and admit that Bush’s plan worked like it or not, but then he would have to admit that based on his comments from the Senate he was wrong again – but I have yet to see anything he has been correct about thus far.

But as you know class and Obama mix and mingle like oil and water and since I’d rather take a nap than listen to Obama babble about things he doesn’t understand -  that’s what I did during his speech. I took a nap.




15 visitors online now
5 guests, 10 bots, 0 members
Max visitors today: 28 at 12:46 pm UTC
This month: 49 at 06-06-2013 04:07 am UTC
This year: 95 at 04-19-2013 07:09 pm UTC
All time: 365 at 03-16-2012 03:55 pm UTC

© 2008-2013 The Angry White Guy All Rights Reserved