AWGBlog

May 31, 2012

Take your social crap apps and shove it…

Filed under: Random Thoughts,WTF — Tags: , , , , , , , — AWG @ 4:39 pm

Facepalmbook

So is it Social or Soialist sites? Facebook gather your information at a alarming rate… just like the socialist do compiling files on their citizens. I have a simple saying I’ve said for years to everyone I know and those that have worked for me, under me and around me….

All information will be disseminated on a need to know basis – if you need to know, you’ll be told.

Now I have a Facebook account otherwise I wouldn’t have a Facebook page for this site… but I’m starting (actually way past it) to get sick of everything being tied to some social this or that… “Hey your friend just watched this video of cute kittens playing – watch it now on Socialcam…. (would you like to allow this application access to all your personal records and your secret diary?) NO! Not just no, but hell NO! Commies and Socialist gather info and build profiles on the people, I’m neither.— So chick here to install the ‘Social Reader’ and allow this application to show everything you read to your friends and while you’re at it log in to this site with Facebook… NO, no and again NO! It’s no ones damn business what I read. And if I … I … ME …. think it’s interesting enough, then.. I will post it to Facebook, because it’s no ones damn business if I read some stupid story about Kim Kardashian’s butt dimples.

Now maybe you allow Facebook access to your contacts, friends, browsing habits, cell phone number, home address, condom/cup size and all that happy stuff, fine that’s your business (and now Facebook’s and their advertising minions) – I don’t nor will I. I don’t need social interaction bad enough to give up my privacy. And those folks that send me request to visit their Farmville, Cityville, Simville, Stupidville or whatever-ville, don’t wait up – because I’ll never show… this goes for any other games, calendars, schedules, Branchout, network list or any application that comes with an “Allow” access to my information button. They don’t need it, you don’t need it and their not getting it.

For the record – I have one application that pulls my post and post them to my blog page and that’s it, I had others early on until they started getting more nosy and wanting more permission so I deleted them instead of allowing them more access – since the one I have is a tool it does access all my personal profile info.

I’m telling you I’m not one on conspiracies but one place, Facebook is compiling to much information in one place and people are allowing it like sheep being lead to slaughter. Google not even as nosy as Facebook, they just still it from your Wi-Fi. I’m seriously to the point of creating a fake profiles full of fake info and fake contacts and deleting my real one, because how long will it be before someplace like Homeland Security says they need access to that information too? It’s for the good of the American people.

Do what you want – you know what I think – giving up all your personal info for free is just Facepalmbook.

On Facebook, ‘Likes’ Become Ads

Amazon is one of many companies that pay Facebook to generate these automated ads when a user clicks to “like” their brands or references them in some other way. Facebook users agree to participate in the ads halfway through the site’s 4,000-word terms of service, which they consent to when they sign up.

,

 

May 30, 2012

The Democrat War on Fathers

Filed under: Random Thoughts — Tags: , , , , , — AWG @ 5:13 pm

Which party supports, promotes and fights for abortion? Democrats! They call it reproductive rights, but unless all of these women have had immaculate conception – I want to know where the reproductive rights of the men are? Well? Tell me…

We’ve all heard about the ginned up, made up, libtard manufactured war on women (excuse me while I yawn)… what about the war on fathers? WHAT?!?! What war on fathers… well I want to know where are fathers rights are in these glorious women issues? When was the last time a women got an abortion and the father was consulted? Ever? Never? After all if the women opts to have the child the father will be understandably legally and financially responsible until the child is an adult. But where is the fairness if the women decides to kill the child and the father would prefer to raise them and save a life? Do they ever ask the father if they are a-ok with killing a life they help create? Nope.

Additionally courts have a tendency to give child custody to the mother in a divorce regardless if the mother is a good mother or a bad one and believe me I’ve known a few women that got custody in a divorce that had no business raising children. Hell I’ve known both mothers and fathers that shouldn’t be allowed with a 100 yards of a child better yet raising one, some children would be better off being raised by wolfs.

Anyway… it’s become common place and accepted practice to give the child by default to the mother with no argument, no questions? Why? If the father bears 50% of the responsibility why should the mother be the primary care giver by default? Oh some will argue that she gave birth to the child therefore she is the primary care giver. But why should a women be the sole voice to end the a pregnancy or give the kid up for adoption when the father would bear many legal responsibility if they choice to continue the pregnancy and keep the kid?

See the father has few rights and no rights regarding abortion or adoption (In KY a father has one year to challenge adoptions if not consulted as it’s deemed a “legal risk adoption”) but they have no rights on abortion at all.

Tell me that these aren’t a greater war on fathers than the fake war on women? And since it’s Democrats that favor, support and promote abortion it would be safe to say it’s a Democrat War on Fathers.

Put that in your liberal pipe libtard women and smoke it.

May 26, 2012

Movie of the Week #120 – Patton

Filed under: Movie of the Week — Tags: — AWG @ 11:32 pm

PATTON

How I have not made this a movie of the week yet – I don’t know, but here it is Patton  - have great and safe Memorial Day weekend.

Patton” tells the tale of General George S. Patton, famous tank commander of World War II. The film begins with Patton’s career in North Africa and progresses through the invasion of Europe and the fall of the Third Reich. Side plots also speak of Patton’s numerous faults such his temper and tendency toward insubordination, faults that would prevent him from becoming the lead American general in the Normandy Invasion as well as to his being relieved as Occupation Commander of Germany.

May 25, 2012

Remember those that paid…

Filed under: FYI — Tags: , — AWG @ 7:16 pm

This weekend millions of Americans will gather to grill, swim and enjoy the company of friends and family – please take a minute, just one minute and remember those that have paid the ultimate price for your freedom, the freedom all across this land and the families of those that have fallen.

I salute all the fallen of all the branches of the American armed services – you’ll understand if I’m a little partial to one.

Thank you and Semper Fi

YouTube Preview Image

Nutty Nutting: Obama a small spender…

Filed under: FYI,lies — Tags: , , , , , , , , — AWG @ 9:05 am

So I guess you heard the latest liberal gloating that Obama is the smallest spender since Jesus… Obama is all over this like a duck on a June bug.’ What’s the word politicains love to use in place of lying? Oh yeah… intellectual dishonesty.

But with everything liberal, there is a problem…

Correcting the media on Obama’s spending record… again

First, Nutting writes, “In the 2009 fiscal year — the last of George W. Bush’s presidency — federal spending rose by 17.9% from $2.98 trillion to $3.52 trillion.” This is inaccurate for two reasons: first, as Nutting notes in a separate chart, Obama was responsible for $140 billion in stimulus spending in 2009. Therefore, insinuating that the 2009 deficit was garnered entirely under President Bush’s watch is misleading.

Second, and related, Nutting fails to place blame for a number of other spending items President Obama signed into law on the President, particularly those from the $410 billion H.R. 1105, the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009. This Act, signed into law by President Obama on March 11, 2009, included the following:

  1.  Five billion dollars worth of earmarks added by Members of Congress.
  2. A funding increase of $8.5 billion in the Labor-HHS-Education portion of the law, excluding emergency appropriations.
  3. A $31 billion increase in nine bills funding various federal agencies over FY 2008, astotaled by the U.S. Conference of Mayor.

All told, as noted by the Canada Free Press, the omnibus increased total spending in the relevant departments by 8% over the prior year. And while $31 billion is not a large amount of money compared to the federal budget in 2009 (it was less than one percent of spending in that year), it was 22% of the $140 billion in deficit spending Nutting credits to Obama. Nutting should still have put the blame for those increases on Obama’s shoulders – as he eventually, and rightly, did with stimulus spending.

Third, Nutting cites the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to claim FY 2013 spending is supposed to go down by 1.3%. This is extremely misleading. In citing the CBO, Nutting is looking at the its 2012 baseline report on spending. This report looks at how current law will impact spending and the deficit. However, in the same report, CBO’s alternative fiscal scenario (what I like to call the politically realistic scenario, with explanations of the likely course Congress will take regarding specific tax and spending programs) expects certain spending reductions to be delayed by Congress. These include cuts to doctor payments in Medicare and the sequestration cuts scheduled to take place in 2013. These and other examinations of fiscal reality cause the CBO to note “deficits would average 5.4 percent of GDP over the 2013–2022 period, rather than the 1.5 percent reflected in CBO’s baseline projections.” The CBO also expects the difference in deficits between the baseline report and alternative fiscal scenario to be about two percent of GDP, or over $300 billion in 2013.

Finally, while Nutting’s thesis focuses exclusively on the time President Obama has been in office, it should be pointed out that then-Senator Obama voted for at least two big-ticket items opposed by many Republicans and signed by Bush – TARP and the auto bailouts. While not looking at these is consistent with Nutting’s thesis, it also leads the reader to forget that it takes three to tango in Washington…and by having control of the House and the Senate Senator Obama and his Democratic allies were two of those partners in spending in Fiscal Year 2009.

OK got that? Obama came into office and started spending like drunken sailor while still technically un the Bush budget and nutty nutting is trying to assign most of this new spending created by Obama to Bust and since the Democrats haven’t passed a budget since Obama took office there is really no spending budget to base anything one and factoring in baseline spending which is automatic increases to the budget these cost aren’t calculated.

It really real simple if Obama hasn’t increased the spending then why has the debt risen at it’s fastest rate in history? Answer that one libtards where did the $5,000,000,000,000.00 go?

I put as much faith in Nutting report as I do in Obama’s ability to tell the truth – none.

Oh one last note…

Real federal deficit dwarfs official tally

The big difference between the official deficit and standard accounting: Congress exempts itself from including the cost of promised retirement benefits. Yet companies, states and local governments must include retirement commitments in financial statements, as required by federal law and private boards that set accounting rules.

The deficit was $5 trillion last year under those rules. The official number was $1.3 trillion. Liabilities for Social Security, Medicare and other retirement programs rose by $3.7 trillion in 2011, according to government actuaries, but the amount was not registered on the government’s books.

And Obama wants to add another government entitlement of healthcare… can you say BROKE?

More here debunking nutty Nutting…
Barack Obama: The Spending King
Claim Obama Slowed Spending Shows Democrats’ Dishonesty
With a Straight Face, Matthews Spins: It’s a ‘Fact’ That Obama Is Not a ‘Reckless Spender’
Actually, the Obama spending binge really did happen
The Truth about President Obama’s Skyrocketing Spending
Mirror, Mirror, on the Wall, Which President Is the Biggest Spender of All?
Obama Is a Spendthrift— And Here’s the Proof (sarcasm)

May 24, 2012

Guest Post – In Defense of Teachable Moments

Filed under: FYI,Random Thoughts — Tags: , , , , , , — AWG @ 2:42 pm

blackboardBy Felice Schachter, MSEd

In Defense of Teachable Moments

I would like to thank the girls who cornered me and hailed brutal insults at me in elementary school. For, without them, I may not have developed the character and strength I gladly possess. I learned valuable lessons from those exchanges, and they have contributed to the successes I experience today. As a mother and an educator, it saddens me to see the safety bubble being placed around our children with a “zero tolerance” protocol pervading our school system. I believe this philosophy is preventing our youth from gaining important life skills, and from expressing themselves in the ways children in schoolyards have throughout history.
Of course, I am deeply saddened by families whose children have suffered or perished as a result of school violence, and empathize with those who have witnessed their loved ones fall victim to hurtful teasing. As a result of the devastating incident at Columbine, as well as far too many episodes of teenage suicide, our society has responded with what appears to be a panacea to prevent any more of these unfortunate episodes. Ignoring the potential impact of untreated depression or the stress of too much schoolwork and the pressure to succeed, the prescription is thus: wipe out all teasing, eliminate all acts of aggression.
And so, the finger has been pointed (perhaps in the wrong direction) at bullying, and the pendulum has swung way too far into the direction of paranoia. But without some level of teasing or bullying, our children are being denied crucial opportunities to learn about themselves and others. They are missing the chance to develop internal coping mechanisms as well as the occasion to negotiate difficult social situations, since we are doing it for them. I fear we are raising a generation of invertebrates, unable to deal with life’s challenges, expecting someone to come to their rescue instead of rescuing themselves.
In my experience, the only way to stop bullying is for the victim to stand up for one’s self, and personally declare boundaries for the one who is testing the parameters of appropriate social behavior. I believe it is our duty as parents and educators to arm our children with the knowledge it takes to accomplish this task.
My own son has been teased and bullied. This type of interaction is to be expected as part of typical childhood development and experience. Fortunately, I have used these events as an opportunity for my son to build his confidence, not deplete it, as well as to teach him how to diffuse precarious situations with a sense of humor. Moments of taunting have led to discussions with my child as to why others’ opinions are important to him (and why they shouldn’t be). An older kid had been making hurtful remarks to him after school every day. We discussed possible comebacks, a way for my son to have a voice and take care of himself, because the world isn’t going to. When the tormentor in question told my son, “I don’t like your stupid haircut,” my son shot back with, “I don’t like your attitude.” The kid never bothered him again. In fact, he started treating my son nicely. Standing up to teasing and bullying can be a way of earning respect from one’s peers, putting the bully in their place and laying the groundwork to nurturing self-respect as well.
We live in a time of excessive lawsuits and laws, thwarting our inherent need to develop critical interpersonal tools, and preventing us to thrive as individuals and as a society. Teasing and bullying have been a part of social interaction throughout history. Are we really going to eradicate it? I think not. And I hope not. For if we do, we erase the opportunities for our children to become self-reliant adults.

Felice Schachter, MSEd

And now for my meager thoughts…

I’ve long said and posted that zero tolerance equates to zero common sense… the realities are kids since the days of the caveman have created their own pecking order, we are after all just animals with a little more aptitude – some more than others, so the inherent and primitive need to establish a hierarchy is in my un-scientific opinion is genetic and old as time itself. We establish this order as children, as teens, as young adults and adults and somebody is always looked to to be the leader of the pack, its a herd mentality. So again in my opinion – children, lacking the sophistication of adults (generally speaking) have a more brutal method of establishing this hierarchy – it is done through bullying, fighting, teasing and posturing. It doesn’t really change a lot as we age and hopefully mature, it just becomes subtler. We never end bullying but as parent it is our job to teach our kids how to deal with it, just as our parent did and theirs before us and so on and son on. Educators and society have taken to blaming bullying for every ill a child encounters – well it has been said and bares repeating there are no bad children, only bad parents. And as recently as today I saw a story of a 7 year old child that seemingly took his own life and bullying was blamed well the story goes on the say that the parent had recently separated… could this have been the cause? A 7-year-old child’s parent split and this is not suspect but bullying at school is? To me that doesn’t add up – I’d ask about the parents – if in fact the child was being bullied where were they? To busying dealing with they own issues and ignoring the child? Bullying didn’t kill this child nor any child the failure of the parent to pay attention to their child’s life and what was happening in it is what killed them. I could go on but this is not my post and I’ve said too much already.

Perhaps I’ll continue another day.

May 23, 2012

OH NO! Man-made Global Redundancy….

Filed under: FYI,WTF — Tags: , , , , — AWG @ 8:10 am

Enough to make your head swim: World’s largest pool which cost $1bn and holds 66m gallons is so big you can even sail boats on it

At the San Alfonso del Mar resort in Chile, a quick dip could well turn into a marathon.

Swimming a length in this, the world’s largest outdoor pool, would mean stroke after stroke for more than three fifths of a mile – that’s 20 Olympic-size swimming pools.

The enormous man-made lagoon is set halfway up the country’s Pacific coast, in the city of Algarrobo, and is filled with 66 million gallons of crystal clear seawater.

Look Granny it’s a cement pond… OK let me get this straight the world largest pool that cost over a billion dollars to build is right on the worlds largest ocean… OK… and it’s the worlds deepest pool that is right on the world deepest ocean… alright got that?… And just like the ocean it is filled with seawater and heated by the sun and again just like the ocean you can sail on it, dive in it, swim in it and it has beaches just like the… ocean. So why not just swim in the ocean and save yourself a billion dollars?

I’m all for capitalism but I’m not for stupidity… and I have never really understood hotels with pools on the ocean, better yet one that is pretty much the same as the oceans in every way minus the fish. I mean why go to a hotel on the ocean if you are just going to swim in the pool? Kind of like flying off to a foreign land and never leaving the airport… were you really there?

What ever will they think up next…. a atrium in the jungle? Maybe the worlds largest sandbox in the desert. I’ve got it, they can put a rock claiming wall at the top of Mt Everest. Kind of reminds me of those restaurants where you have to cook your own food – sort defeats the whole idea behind going to a restaurant doesn’t it? I mean really if I wanted to cook I would have stayed home and done it and saved myself a $100.

Hey I’ve got a great idea… I’m going to open a grocery store where you have to bring your own groceries and bag them — just bring them in and I’ll have a look and tell you how much you owe me and you can leave… it’s be just like shopping without the hassle of picking things out and walking up and down aisles, it’ll be big fun.

May 21, 2012

Shut up and Cut…

Filed under: Congress,FYI,Politics — Tags: , , , , , — AWG @ 9:06 pm

So the other day I was listing to the radio and I heard Slick Willie Bill Clinton say …

 ”This is just me now, I’m not speaking for the White House — I  think you could tax me at a 100 percent and you wouldn’t balance the budget,” said Clinton, who has earned tens of millions of dollars since leaving office. “We are all going to have to contribute to this, and if middle class people’s wages were going up again, and we had some growth to the economy, I don’t think  they would object to going back to tax rates [from] when I was president” – before the Bush tax cuts.

The more I thought about it the madder I got – I’m sick of taxes going up on everything every time I turn around, I’m sick of this slimy ass politician that ran up all this debt looking to us for the money – we’ve been screaming to cut spending and stop spending more than you take it, but these ass munchers just keep buying votes with handouts to the moochers at the tax payer expense and protest.

I just want to scream shut up and cut the spending, get out of my life and STFU! So Clinton, don’t tell me how tough things are when you are charging $200,000 per speech – don’t tell me you understand and you feel my pain, you don’t – you dope from Hope… just retire already! Both you and Jimmy can take a lesson from George – retire, shut up and set down. I swear can a Democrat ever leave office and just shut up? No I don’t think it’s possible.

I’ll tell you what soon as these greasy bastards start turning over ever dime they make to the government I’ll lesson to them, until then – zip it.

See here is the deal these clowns in Washington keep whining and crying that cutting handouts is mean and heartless, people will die in the street – well continuing to spend more than you take in and continuing to look to those few remaining people with jobs that actually pay into the system is mean and heartless. I get so sick and tire of hearing about paying you fair share – well what about the 47% that don’t pay a damn dime of income tax into the system – what’s their fair share? Seems to me if you have the 53% of the population paying 100% of the taxes and 47% paying nothing that’s not fair! It’s time to SHARE the burden of paying taxes – I don’t care if it’s only $100 you need to have some SKIN IN THE GAME.

See the way I see it is real simple – if you’re not picking up the tab, you don’t care how much the meal cost.

So I don’t want to hear some Democrat like Bill Clinton that only saw a budget surplus thanks to a Republican Congress say a damn word about anything – he’s a Washington insider that’s part of the problem and is not the solution. So Clinton… shut it just set down and STFU.

 

May 20, 2012

Movie of the Week #119 – One Million Years B.C.

Filed under: Movie of the Week — Tags: — AWG @ 7:35 pm

One Million Years B.C.

How can you not like a 26 y/o Raquel Welch in a fur bikini? The movie is about… oh who cares, it’s Raquel Welch  in a fur bikini that’s all that matters.

Caveman Tumak is banished from his savage tribe. He finds a brief home among a group of gentle seacoast dwelling cave people until he is banished from them as well. Missing him, one of their women, Loana leaves with him, deciding to face the harsh prehistoric world with its monsters and volcanos as a couple.

May 18, 2012

Obama is Everywhere Man

Filed under: Random Thoughts,WTF — Tags: , , , , , , , , — AWG @ 8:02 am

So have you seen this latest act of narcissism? Obama has been injected into nearly Presidential Biography on the White House website… ego gone wide.

Obama vandalizes White House presidential biographies to insert himself

It seems nothing is safe from President Obama these days.

Not only did he politicize Mother’s Day with an e-card from Obamacare, he has also inserted himself into the biographies of former presidents on the White House web site.

Philip Klein of the Washington Examiner noted Tuesday that “[c]onservatives are having a laugh after it surfaced that the official presidential biographies on the White House website have been updated to inject President Obama into history.”

“But kidding aside,” he added, “this is a truly disgraceful behavior.”

The most egregious example, he wrote, was discovered by Rory Cooper of the Heritage Foundation.

Cooper found a note appended to the official biography ofRonald Reagan, which says:

In a June 28, 1985 speech Reagan called for a fairer tax code, one where a multi-millionaire did not have a lower tax rate than his secretary. Today, President Obama is calling for the same with the Buffett Rule.

“Put aside the fact that what Reagan was proposing in 1985 had nothing to do with the Buffett Rule. Obama should not vandalize his predecessors’ biographies to promote his own agenda,” Klein wrote.

Well the RNC has taken time to help Obama insert himself into history…

OBAMA IN HISTORY

You know I don’t know if I should get mad or just laugh at how pathetic Obama and his massive ego is… it’s really sad… it’s laughable.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress

21 visitors online now
9 guests, 12 bots, 0 members
Max visitors today: 30 at 02:00 pm UTC
This month: 67 at 05-08-2013 12:05 pm UTC
This year: 95 at 04-19-2013 07:09 pm UTC
All time: 365 at 03-16-2012 03:55 pm UTC

© 2008-2013 The Angry White Guy All Rights Reserved