AWGBlog

November 29, 2011

The Thrill is gone…

Filed under: Politics — Tags: , , — AWG @ 7:16 pm

As if it news, the precious independents are turning on little Barry… the thrill is gone.

YouTube Preview Image

Poll: Obama is tanking with independents

Obama’s approval rating has decreased among all six partisan/ideology groups Gallup tracks on a regular basis since January, but it has dropped the most — 10 percentage points, from 40 percent to 30 percent — among pure independents. These are the roughly 14 percent of national adults who neither identify with one of the two major parties nor indicate a leaning. Obama’s approval rating has declined by nearly as much — eight points — among moderate/liberal Republicans, from 29 percent to 21 percent.

That’s because Obama sucks and not even the droning on and on and on of his endless blabbering can drown out the sound of his sucking.

November 28, 2011

You have the right to… oops no you don’t.

Well, well, well look at this crap here… the senate has a bill to allow the military to arrest and detain citizens without trail or charges… just because.

Senate Moves To Allow Military To Intern Americans Without Trial

“The Senate is going to vote on whether Congress will give this president—and every future president — the power to order the military to pick up and imprison without charge or trial civilians anywhere in the world. The power is so broad that even U.S. citizens could be swept up by the military and the military could be used far from any battlefield, even within the United States itself,” writes Chris Anders of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office.

Under the ‘worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial’ provision of S.1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill, which is set to be up for a vote on the Senate floor this week, the legislation will “basically say in law for the first time that the homeland is part of the battlefield,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who supports the bill.

I bet Gramnesty wouldn’t support it if it was aimed at picking up and detaining illegals.

The bill was drafted in secret by Senators Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.), before being passed in a closed-door committee meeting without any kind of hearing. The language appears in sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA bill.

Oh Senor Juan McLame who would have ever guessed? I did! Explains why it’s more aimed at Americans than illegals or terrorist.

“I would also point out that these provisions raise serious questions as to who we are as a society and what our Constitution seeks to protect,” Colorado Senator Mark Udall said in a speech last week. One section of these provisions, section 1031, would be interpreted as allowing the military to capture and indefinitely detain American citizens on U.S. soil. Section 1031 essentially repeals the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 by authorizing the U.S. military to perform law enforcement functions on American soil. That alone should alarm my colleagues on both sides of the aisle, but there are other problems with these provisions that must be resolved.”

I am no Constitutional lawyer but my thoughts are this would trample all over the Forth Amendment of said Constitution – it will be interesting to hear Mark Levin’s take on this who is a Constitutional Lawyer. It goes on…

This means Americans could be declared domestic terrorists and thrown in a military brig with no recourse whatsoever. Given that the Department of Homeland Security has characterized behavior such as buying gold, owning guns, using a watch or binoculars, donating to charity, using the telephone or email to find information, using cash, and all manner of mundane behaviors as potential indicators of domestic terrorism, such a provision would be wide open to abuse.

“American citizens and people picked up on American or Canadian or British streets being sent to military prisons indefinitely without even being charged with a crime. Really? Does anyone think this is a good idea? And why now?” asks Anders.

This is in my opinion more overreaching of power by the government in the name of terrorism – we have laws and provisions in place to detain and capture enemies of the state in the country and to strip the American people of constitutional rights is another dangerous step to further oppression. We need less government not more and in the words of Thomas Paine…

“That government is best which governs least”

And we have a government that is dead set on governing more and the poor quality of our current government validates Thomas Paine’s words. Might want to give your Senator a jingle – just sayin’…

November 26, 2011

Movie of the Week #96 – Planes, Trains & Automobiles

Filed under: Movie of the Week — Tags: — AWG @ 12:36 am

Planes, Trains & Automobiles

All that Neal Page wants to do is to get home for Thanksgiving. His flight has been cancelled due to bad weather, so he decides on other means of transport. As well as bad luck, Neal is blessed with the presence of Del Griffith, Shower Curtain Ring Salesman and all-around blabbermouth, who is never short of advice, conversation, bad jokes, or company. And when he decides that he is going the same direction as Neal….

November 23, 2011

Happy Thanksgiving 2011!

Filed under: FYI — Tags: , — AWG @ 9:38 am

What's wrong with this picture?

No politics over the holidays from me – I might post the Movie of the Week but that that will be about it! And since there are so many more readers today like 2 or 3 more than there was the first Thanksgiving I posted this … I bring you a blast from the past and the story of the first Thanksgiving —

Happy Turkey Day… but shouldn’t have been venison, calm, lobster, rabbit, goose day?

Way back in 1620 the Pilgrims landed on Plymouth Rock to begin the settlement of the new world… right? Well no… they did arrive in 1620 on the Mayflower, that’s true! They weren’t called pilgrims there were colonist but they didn’t call themselves that, see pilgrims make pilgrimages for religious reason to spread the word of their religion… these folks were ill prepared to spread anything as they came to the new world completely unequipped to setup a new civilization… in reality they called themselves “Saints”; others called them “Separatists.” Some of the settlers were “Puritans,” dissidents but not separatists who wanted to “purify” the Church of England. It wasn’t until around the time of the American Revolution that the name “Pilgrims” came to be associated with the Plimoth (Plymouth) settlers, and the “Pilgrims” became the symbol of American morality and Christian faith, fortitude, and family… a symbol not a fact. So we’ll call them pilgrims to keep it simple. Now recall my post on the pilgrims and the failed attempt at socialism and later problems with “immorality” as written by William Bradford. It’s worth noting that they were so poorly prepared that at the end of the first year, out of the 102 people that arrived on Mayflower only 53 were left for the “first thanksgiving.” … not a good start.

But the Plymouth Rock part is true, right? Well, no it’s not either… the colonist landed in a sandy inlet on Cape Cod as written by William Bradford the first governor of the Plymouth Colony then they sailed to the a area to what would become Plymouth, but first they sent out a small craft to find a place to land which they were nearly lost in a storm and Indian attacks… but that’s another story. So the first mention of Plymouth Rock wasn’t until 1715 nearly a 100 years after the Mayflower’s arrival. The myth began with 94 year old Thomas Faunce who in 1741 claimed his father told him some 120 years earlier that was the rock the colonist first landed on when he heard the community was going to build a wharf over the rock, “which impressed his mind with deep concern, and excited a strong desire to take a last farewell of the cherished object” (From History of the Town of Plymouth by James Thacher, 1835) and from there the story Plymouth Rock was born, it’s great for tourism but reality it’s not.

But they ate and had a big feast right and the Pilgrims invited the Indians to share in their wealth of the harvest and everybody was happy-happy, right? … Ah not exactly. See the Indians didn’t really trust the pilgrims nor did the pilgrims trust the Indians… in fact when the pilgrims went out to hunt for the so-called First Thanksgiving (which wasn’t the first but that’s another story too) the Indians thought the pilgrims were preparing for war with them.

According to oral accounts from the Wampanoag people, when the Native people nearby first heard the gunshots of the hunting colonists, they thought that the colonists were preparing for war and that Massasoit needed to be informed. When Massasoit showed up with 90 men and no women or children, it can be assumed that he was being cautious. When he saw there was a party going on, his men then went out and brought back five deer and lots of turkeys*.

*nowhere is “turkey” ever mentioned by name in Bradford or Winslow’s writings that I recall they only list it as “wild fowl” i.e. duck, goose, dove, turkey and any number of birds could have been collected.

In addition, both the Wampanoag and the English settlers were long familiar with harvest celebrations. Long before the Europeans set foot on these shores, Native peoples gave thanks every day for all the gifts of life, and held thanksgiving celebrations and giveaways at certain times of the year. The Europeans also had days of thanksgiving, marked by religious services. So the coming together of two peoples to share food and company was not entirely a foreign thing for either. But the visit that by all accounts lasted three days was most likely one of a series of political meetings to discuss and secure a military alliance. Neither side totally trusted the other: The Europeans considered the Wampanoag soulless heathens and instruments of the devil, and the Wampanoag had seen the Europeans steal their seed corn and rob their graves. In any event, neither the Wampanoag nor the Europeans referred to this feast/meeting as “Thanksgiving.”

per: Correspondence with Margaret M. Bruchac about the relationship Samoset, Tisquantum, Hobbamock, and Massasoit. See also Margaret M. Bruchac and Catherine O’Neill Grace, 1621: A New Look at Thanksgiving.

So how about the deer and wild fowl stuff, Edward Winslow, Mourt’s Relation writes (old spelling intact)…

“our harvest being gotten in, our governour sent foure men on fowling, that so we might after a speciall manner rejoyce together, after we had gathered the fruits of our labours ; they foure in one day killed as much fowle, as with a little helpe beside, served the Company almost a weeke, at which time amongst other Recreations, we exercised our Armes, many of the Indians coming amongst us, and amongst the rest their greatest king Massasoyt, with some ninetie men, whom for three dayes we entertained and feasted, and they went out and killed five Deere, which they brought to the Plantation and bestowed on our Governour, and upon the Captaine and others. And although it be not always so plentifull, as it was at this time with us, yet by the goodness of God, we are so farre from want, that we often wish you partakers of our plentie.”

But they had popcorn right… I mean – come on every school kid knows the Indians brought popcorn to the first thanksgiving. There had to be popcorn… ah sorry, no it’s a myth invented by Jane G. Austen in her novel Standish of Standish (1889), p. 281:

The meal was a rude one looked upon with the dainty eyes and languid appetites of to-day, but to those sturdy and heroic men and women it was a veritable feast, and at its close Quadequina with an amiable smile nodded to one of his attendants, who produced and poured upon the table something like a bushel of popped corn, – a dainty hitherto unseen and unknown by most of the Pilgrims. All tasted, and John Howland hastily gathering up a portion upon a wooden plate carried it up to the Common house for the delectation of the women, that is to say, for Elizabeth Tilley, whose firm young teeth craunched [sic.] it with much gusto.

The reality…
No Popcorn: The Question of Popcorn at the ‘First Thanksgiving’

As far as can be ascertained, there was no true popcorn or podcorn in the eastern New England region in 1621 or at the “First Thanksgiving”. It hasn’t been found archaeologically, and there isn’t any New England reference to the popcorn we know today in the 17th century. Sweet corn is documented as only arriving in the region ca. 1779 (Mangelsdof, p. 110), and popcorn may well have arrived in a similar way from the upstate New York area. The presence of the larger flint and/or flour corn in New England is well documented in the studies on corn (such as Paul Mangelsdorf, Corn Its Origin, Evolution and Improvement (Cambridge, 1974); Arthur Parker, “Iroquois Uses of Maize,” in Parker on the Iroquois, Fenton, ed. (Syracuse, 1968); Paul Weatherwax, Indian Corn in Old America (New York, 1954). The first widespread use of corn in the Northeast is now set at ca.1100, A.D. (Bruce D. Smith, Rivers of Change, (Washington, 1992), p. 292), which might account for a fairly specialized selection of maize varieties here 500 years later.

So what do we know about the First Thanksgiving? Well not a lot as only one creditable account survive and that is of Edward Winslow, Mourt’s Relation which can be read in it’s entirety here.

Know your history folks it keep more and more bastardized everyday… have a happy and safe Thanksgiving! See you when it’s all over I need a break and I thank you for reading.

I’ll see you next week!

November 22, 2011

Screw you eBay, I’m going home…

Filed under: FYI,That's Cool! — Tags: , , , , — AWG @ 7:57 am

So I have a bunch of stuff I need to sell and I mean a bunch… I was going to sell it on eBay I always have in the past until I had something tell me that eBay was taking a slice of your shipping fees too – I was like what? Surely not, their not the post office!

Sure enough – seems between the last time I sold and now they started charging a fee on shipping. Here I found this article…

eBay to Charge Final Value Fees on Shipping Costs

Here’s how it breaks out:

eBay starts by reducing Final Value Fee rates.  Sounds good right?

For example, currently if you are a store owner and sell a lamp for $25 and it costs you $25 to ship the lamp, you pay 12% of the final sale price.

12% of $25 =$3.00

In July that fee drops to 11%.

But here’s the hitch. The fee now applies to your item price plus shipping costs.

Under the new rate, which takes effect in July, you’ll be charged 11% on the item price $25 + shipping $25 = $50.  Your new  fees?  $5.50    A fee increase of 83%.

So now if I charge shipping because I know it’s crazy… I have to pay to ship it – now ebay wants a slice of that pie too. Well…

YouTube Preview Image

I’m all for capitalism, but when your start cutting into my capitalism just because you are a huge near monopoly and giving me a fee rape without the courtesy of a reach around – I’ll take my toys and play in another sand box. Shipping cost haven’t and aren’t going down, bubble wrap and tape is not going down, gas to drive it to the post office is twice as high as it was 3 years ago and now ebay want to get a slice of your shipping too? Who do they think they are the government?

I know you’re thinking just use free shipping and stick the cost onto the price – true I could do that but you start getting into the psychology of buying – many people look at the price and not the shipping and some combine the two – it just all depends on the buyer but a higher starting price to cover shipping requires a higher insertion fee and a high slice of a final value it’s gets into a a lot of number but in the end the sellers like me that aren’t putting up 100′s of items a week get screwed big time…

So why did eBay decide to screw the seller?

You may be wonder why eBay would make  such a change? Especially during a time when margins are more squeezed than ever, especially for small sellers.

eBay has stated that “buyers have told us they love free shipping”.  Of course they do! Buyers would love free products too if it were an option.

But free shipping was never meant to be the norm. It was meant to be used for special promotions.If you give your kid a birthday cake every single day of the year, it ceases to be special. It becomes ordinary. Expected.   The same holds true for free shipping.

… In fact there is no such thing as free shipping.  There is a hard cost to shipping.  And either the merchant or the buyer pays that cost.  (Last I heard FedEx wasn’t shipping products for free.)

So, should you keep your business on eBay?

And besides it’s not eBay’s job to force sellers into free shipping just because buyers like it… if free shipping for buyers are so important to eBay then eBay can pay the damn shipping. So I might continue to buy stuff on eBay but I’m done selling there. Charging a final value fee on shipping is wrong…

YouTube Preview Image

Buy the way if you are looking for 1/35 scale military model kits, N-scale trains and scale models, antiques, DVD’s and a variety of other things let me know – because you won’t find my stuff on eBay. BTW I’ve sold more and made more in a week on local selling sites than I ever would on eBay and I don’t have to screw with shipping and eBay’s pimp policies.

November 19, 2011

Movie of the Week #95 – Duck Soup

Filed under: Movie of the Week — Tags: — AWG @ 12:16 am

Duck Soup

The Marx Brothers probably my favorite comics – Groucho Marx’s razor sharp wit is legendary! In fact one of my dogs is named Groucho. So if you have never seen that Marx Brothers go now and rent or buy them they are hilarious or you can watch the link at the bottom, now for the movie, one of many…

The small state of Freedonia is in a financial mess, borrowing a huge sum of cash from wealthy widow Mrs. Teasdale. She insists on replacing the current president with crazy Rufus T. Firefly and mayhem erupts. To make matters worse, the neighboring state sends inept spies Chicolini and Pinky to obtain top secret information, creating even more chaos!

And here is the entire movie…

November 17, 2011

Return to Apprenticeship Training…

Filed under: Random Thoughts — Tags: , , , , — AWG @ 9:51 pm

I’m to the point of saying screw colleges, they’re over priced, overrated, overly liberal and socialist recruiting grounds. I can’t tell you how many college grad after college grad with an alphabet of letters behind their name  that I’ve met that are for the most part bipedal functioning idiots that couldn’t find their ass with both hands and a road map. That’s not to say everyone is that way – far from it – I’ve met  of brilliant college grads, but you have to ask – did college make them brilliant or were they already that way? I think the latter. You can have all the books smarts in the world but without the ability to apply that knowledge and use critical thinking – well all that learning is nothing but a sheet of paper. Frankly, I’d rather see someone with a DD214 than a PhD – a DD214 proves something to me that a PhD never will.

Here why I think college is becoming increasingly worthless… first thing is college degrees are a dime a dozen, we are the most over educated country in the world without the practical skills needed to have a functioning society. I can find more college grads working at McDonald’s than I can skilled tradesmen. Here are some examples…

Have you ever tried to get an analog mechanical clock repaired? If you can find someone that does it they’re generally pretty old because there are is no one young learning the trade and you can bet your bottom dollar it will cost you – so if there is good money to be made why aren’t people going into that profession? What about a cabinet maker? Ever had custom solid wood, made in America with American wood by American workers cabinet’s made? If you have then you know who deep you’ve got to dig to pay for those – again good money in that job and it’s a skill you can’t learn in college. What about a machinist that has the skill the scrape by hand… odds are there are extremely few people reading this even know what I’m talking about. It’s a dying art form and a valuable skill in machining. What about leather working? I took it in school and today it is no longer taught – try getting a saddle repaired without a leather-worker or any of a multitude of other leather products.

Ever look for a tailor that can make a custom fit suit? Or a cobbler to repair your shoes? No we have become a society to that pitched them and buys new one – frankly I’d rather pay $25 to get a sole repaired than to drop $250 on a new pair of boots.

People with a skill are becoming a rare breed – and some folks might say why should I learn how to do this or that when I can pay someone to do it – well it’s simple you can loose your money, but not your knowledge. So I ask which is worth more? A skill or a piece of paper?

November 16, 2011

Crime Roundup: Occupy Party verses Tea Party

Occupy Party verses Tea Party
This only covers reported actions and events, the Occupy Group as made an effort to NOT report crimes to the media or police.
Due to the fluid nature of event these are only current as of  0700 11/15/11

 

REPORTED

OCCUPY PARTY

TEA PARTY

ARREST

4149+

0

DEATHS

7

0

RAPES

12+

0

ARSON DAMAGE

$10,000,000.00

$0

PUBLIC DEFECATION

YES

NO

ANTISEMITIC RANTS

12+

0

COST TO TAXPAYERS (11/9)

$19,327,487.00+

$0

PUBLIC MASTURBATION

3+

0

MOLOTOV COCKTAILS THROWN

10+

0

FIGHTS STARTED

YES

NO

CHILDREN EXPLOITED

YES

NO

POLICE CARS DAMAGED

2+

0

PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS

YES

NO

DRUG POSSESSION ARREST

YES

NO

CONCEALED WEAPON ARREST

YES

NO

DRUG OVERDOSE

YES

NO

THEFTS

YES

NO

BURGLARIES

YES

NO

VANDALISM ARREST

YES

NO

TRESPASSING ARREST

YES

NO

NON FATAL SHOOTINGS

1

0

PUBLIC URINATION

YES

NO

URINATION ON OTHERS

YES

NO

ISRAELI FLAGS BURNED

2+

0

AMERICAN FLAGS BURNED

1

0

AMERICAN FLAGS DANCED ON

1

0

AMERICAN FLAGS DESECRATION

25+

0

FELONY ASSAULT ON AN EMT

1

0

HEAD/BODY LICE OUTBREAKS

1

0

TUBERCULOSIS OUTBREAKS

1

0

MURDER

1

0

SUICIDE

1

0

ZUCCOTTI LUNG

MANY

0

SHOTS FIRED AT WHITE HOUSE

1

0

SCABIES OUTBREAKS

1

0

OBAMA ENDORSED

YES

NO

PELOSI ENDORSED

YES

NO

CAIR ENDORSED

YES

NO

SOCIALIST PARTY ENDORSED

YES

NO

NAZI PARTY ENDORSED

YES

NO

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ENDORSED

YES

NO

COMMUNIST PARTY ENDORSED

YES

NO

BIDEN ENDORSED

YES

NO

HUGO CHAVEZ ENDORSED

YES

NO

BLACK PANTHERS ENDORSED

YES

NO

HEZBOLLAH ENFORCED

YES

NO

MARXIST UNION ENDORSED

YES

NO

9/11 TRUTHER ENDORSED

YES

NO

BOLSHEVIK ENDORSED

YES

NO

IRAN GOVERNMENT ENDORSED

YES

NO

AYATOLLAH ENDORSED

YES

NO

NORTH KOREA ENDORSED

YES

NO

FARRAKHAN ENDORSED

YES

NO

NATION OF ISLAM ENDORSED

YES

NO

DAVID DUKE ENDORSED

YES

NO

 

http://pjmedia.com/zombie/2011/11/09/fresh-anti-semitic-videos-coming-out-of-occupy-wall-street/
http://occupyarrests.wordpress.com/
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/11/09/rash-sex-attacks-and-violent-crime-breaks-out-at-occupy-protests/
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2011/11/occupy-crime-wave-update-3.php
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/09/nyregion/at-occupy-wall-street-protest-rising-concern-about-crime.html
http://www.metro.us/newyork/local/article/1015197–michael-bloomberg-crime-at-occupy-wall-street-goes-unreported
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/10782794-the-rape-of-a-protester-occupy-wall-street-new-york-city
http://newsone.com/nation/newsonestaff1/occupy-wall-st-rapist-rape/
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/29683079/detail.html
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/11/third-occupy-protester-found-dead-in-tent-national-media-silent/
http://christopherdiarmani.com/4078/stupid-human-tricks/occupy-vancouvers-drug-overdoses-and-deaths-are-no-big-deal-according-to-event-spokescritters/
http://www.thebostonchannel.com/r-video/29584429/detail.html
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2011/11/police_looking_for_suspects_in.html
http://boston.cbslocal.com/2011/10/25/stores-first-break-ins-in-23-years-coincide-with-arrival-of-occupy-boston/ http://nation.foxnews.com/occupy-wall-street/2011/11/02/occupy-permit-yanked-because-public-masturbation
http://www.occupywallst.org/forum/the-first-deaths-at-an-occupy-campzucotti-park/
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2011/11/08/occupiers-in-san-diego-show-gratitude-for-free-food-just-kidding-they-vandalize-the-carts-threaten-owners/
http://pjmedia.com/rogerkimball/2011/11/05/quote-of-the-day-on-occupy-wall-street/
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/11/09/confirmed-occupy-oakland-loves-banks/
http://www.owsexposed.com/2011/11/05/dc-occupiers-use-children-to-blockade-door-during-violent-scuffle/
http://www.flashalert.net/news.html?id=3056#news49177
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20111110/NEWS02/111110019/Breaking-Police-respond-shooting-City-Hall-Park?odyssey=mod|breaking|text|FRONTPAGE
http://www.facebook.com/OccupyArrestsProject
http://yourjewishnews.com/12307.aspx
http://journalstar.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/article_2c1f17f8-9861-5d97-8cbb-808df70c23f8.html
http://ironicsurrealism.com/2011/11/07/occupydenver-deface-and-dance-on-american-flag-photo/
http://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthread.php?85767-Burning-zionist-flag-in-quot-Occupy-wall-street
http://weaselzippers.us/2011/10/22/more-american-flag-desecration-from-the-wall-street-occupiers/
http://weaselzippers.us/2011/11/10/senior-iranian-general-calls-on-wall-street-occupiers-to-denounce-u-s-threats-to-islamic-republic/
http://www.verumserum.com/?p=32348
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Occupy-Wall-Street-EMT-Assaulted-Zuccotti-Park-Arrest-133613788.html
http://atlanta.cbslocal.com/2011/11/10/tuberculosis-breaks-out-at-occupy-atlantas-base/#.TrxQDShI0Jw.facebook
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/11/10/report-man-shot-near-occupy-oakland-camp/
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57322544/man-dies-from-gunshot-at-vt–occupy-protest/
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Zuccotti-Lung-Park-Sickness-Demonstrators-Protesters-Illness-133669113.html?dr
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2011/11/woman-raped-at-occupy-philadelphia/
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/nypd_raiders_roust_rabble_Dp5jSkaFLwGXYElqsxsWjO
http://tv.breitbart.com/caught-on-video-occupy-protester-defecates-in-public-street/
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/11/occupy-oakland-losses-to-the-city-top-2-million.html
http://www.wtop.com/?nid=109&sid=2635318
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/deaths-occupy-camps-bring-pressure-shutdown-14938732#.TsQLu_KvPcw
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/pennsylvania/133942613.html
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/42320
http://www.angrywhiteguy.com/?p=9211

November 15, 2011

Treating the troops like trash…

Filed under: FYI,Ticked Off — Tags: , , , , , , — AWG @ 7:44 pm

Dover mortuary landfill dumping: Congressman asked Pentagon about practice in Sept.

A New Jersey congressman wrote directly to Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta two months ago to seek details about the Dover Air Force Base mortuary’s practice of dumping troops’ cremated body parts in a landfill but says he never received a reply.

The congressman’s letter raises questions about when Panetta learned that the mortuary disposed of cremated portions of remains at the King George County, Va., landfill. Panetta has said he was unaware of the dumping before this week.

Isn’t it funny how nobody knows anything in the Obama administration… Holder doesn’t know about Fast and Furious, Obama didn’t know about Solyndra, Palosi know nothing about nothing etc etc… seems like anytime anything goes to shit in this government nobody knows anything about it.

Rep. Rush Holt (D-N.J.), acting on behalf of a constituent whose husband was killed in Iraq and was prepared for burial by the Dover mortuary, said he sent a letter to Panetta on Sept. 16 “seeking clear and definitive answers” about the mortuary’s landfill practices. Holt said he had raised the issue a few months earlier with the Pentagon’s legislative affairs office but was “frustrated by a failure” to get a full response.

Pentagon press secretary George Little said Friday that Panetta’s office had received Holt’s Sept. 16 correspondence and that staffers “have been working to collect the information required to answer the questions in the congressman’s letter. We will, of course, provide a thorough response as promptly as possible.”

You are shitting me right? Since Sept 16th they have been working on an answer? What? A buy some time while we cover our ass answer?

Air Force officials have said they dumped only cremated fragments or portions of body parts that were unable to be identified at first or were later recovered from the battlefield. Family members had authorized the military to dispose of those portions.

The Air Force said the body parts were cremated, then incinerated, and taken to the landfill by a military contractor. The manner of disposal was not disclosed to relatives of the troops.

Image not disclosing that to the family… I’m sure they’d be OK with sending their kid to the dump.

In his letter to Panetta, Holt asked why the ashes were trucked to the landfill and not interred at Arlington National Cemetery. He also asked whether the human remains had been mixed with incinerated medical waste, and he sought information on which military contractors were responsible.

As of Friday, Holt said, he still had not received answers from Panetta’s office.

Maybe if they ignore it, it will go away – beside the it’s cheaper to just dump them.

“I thought there would be some straightforward explanation that we could get fairly quickly,” Holt said in a telephone interview. “Evidently this has been harder for them to answer.”

This is a Democrat complaining about getting answers out for the government – welcome to our world.

In 2007, Gari-Lynn Smith received her husband’s autopsy report and learned that some remains had not been found in time to include in his casket.

Over the next four years, she tried to find out what happened to those body parts. A Dover mortuary official notified her in April that they had been cremated and taken to the landfill.

How would you like the government to tell you… ‘Oh by the way we took your spouses parts to the dump.’

In addition, Holt criticized the Pentagon for not informing him — at the time of his inquiries this summer — that the Air Force was simultaneously conducting a separate investigation into the Dover mortuary.

The results of that 18-month investigation were made public Tuesday, when federal investigators said they had documented “gross mismanagement” after whistleblowers complained about lost body parts, shoddy inventory controls and lax supervision.

“Gross mismanagement” is a slight understatement.

Panetta has said he was fully briefed about the probe as soon as he took office in July. That investigation, however, did not examine the mortuary’s landfill-dumping.

The defense secretary appointed an independent panel Tuesday to review overall operations at the mortuary. The panel’s leader, former U.S. surgeon general Richard H. Carmona, quit Friday so he instead could run for the Senate. He is seeking an open seat from Arizona.

What a damn minute… if we go back to the top Panetta said he didn’t know about it until this week and now he knew about it the day he took office in July? Well which is it? I smell a lie – but what’s knew with this bunch?

Now understand this didn’t just happen under the Obama administration it started in 2003 so their are a lot of people that need to answer questions and any one apart of this should face some sought of charges light abuse of a corpse.

Pathetic that our government would treat our troops this way – shameful.

November 14, 2011

Some Female Blogger Want to Sue Over Things they don’t Want to Read…

Filed under: FYI,Random Thoughts,WTF — Tags: , , , , , — AWG @ 3:47 pm

cHaD451 said I look like a circus clown... I'm going to file charges! (Is that sexist?)

(Some) Women you might want to stop reading now, because lord knows I wouldn’t want to hurt your little feeling or damage your psyche by saying something that offends you …

OK are the self-identified whiners I’m mean ‘ladies’ gone? Good!

Here is the deal we all get verbally assaulted, offended or otherwise put off by what someone or some group says from time to time and I know I have been one to piss off more than my fair share of people by saying – “You know what… deal with it!” I’ve had people say things to me that that piss me off, but that’s my problem not theirs so when I hear some folks complain about something said to them I say you choose how to react and if you feed the flames then the fire burns hotter, ignore it and you just doused it with cold water. Hell, for that matter it’s just words on a screen that you chose to read – if somebody say something online and you start reading and you know it’s going to be offended then STOP READING IT!

Anyway…

Currently they’re is a group of female bloggers that are pissed off about alleged misogyny online and are bitching (Is that sexist?) about it. Let me try to explain this to them without getting their panties in a wad (Is that sexist?)… the internet is a big place it crosses all boarders and covers all walks of life and there are going to be people out there that piss you off, period. (Is that sexist?) There is going to be people that say things you don’t agree with, that offends you and at times you might receive a personal attack, insult, rude remark or threats – SO DEAL WITH IT!

If I had a dime for every threat, attack, insult, ad hominem or person telling me to do something anatomically impossible that I’ve received online – I’d be retired on a tropical island with a fancy cocktail in a cocoanut with an umbrella all served up by a scantly clad tropical beauty with low or no morals. (Is that sexist?) But to the heart of the matter… this is the internet, it’s NOT your place of work! The vast majority of thing said here are from faceless, nameless people you will never meet nor likely know even if you ran into them on the street – so why do you care and why worry about it? Who gives a shit what WarHammerZ, Vette2001, MuffDiver69 or whatever their goofy-ass screen-name thinks about anything? I know I don’t.

For the record I do not condone violence against women or anyone – granted I know more than a few people of both sexes that could use a good old fashion ass whoopin’ but I’m not out there advocating someone goes and does it. Personally, I’ve never hit a women in my life unless you count the fight I had with a girl named Shelia in the First grade! But this entire planet has become full of politically correct whiners trying to shield themselves from the reality that not everyone agrees or likes them and that they may lash out in ways behind the safety of a keyboard and say things they wouldn’t say to your face… doubt me? You should see some of my hate mail.

BTW – nothing I say here is anything I wouldn’t say to your face – treat me with respect, you’ll get it in return – dog me and my God have mercy on your fragile mental and emotional state, I’m going to destroy it.

So anyway I say all of that about this…

Women bloggers seek to fight online misogyny, critics decry threat to free speech

The New Statesman’s Helen Lewis-Hasteley recently brought together nine female bloggers to recount their plight as victims of online hate. The women’s complaints focus largely on being called mean things, from the traditional women insults (“bitch,” “fat,” “ugly”) to those overtly sexual and violent.

“I’m not sure what the solution to all this is, although I’m beginning to wonder if it might be worth one or more of us having a go at taking a test case through the criminal justice system,” wrote freelance writer Eleanor O’Hagan, telling her tale to the New Statesman. “In the meantime though, I think it’s imperative that women who write online continue to speak out about the abuse we’re subjected to, and that we expose the Internet misogynists at every opportunity we get.”

Yeah that’s it – let’s be a fat ugly bitch (Is that sexist?) and sue somebody for calling you a fat ugly bitch – pure genius! Let your actions qualify the charges – that’ll show’em!. This is nothing but another effort by libtards to suppress free speech will if I was a betting my I’d say it’s liberals – I haven’t cared enough to research it that closely, but you need to understand free speech includes shit you don’t want to hear, shit you don’t like and my find distasteful it may include vulgarities, insults and phrases designed to shock and offend. This whiner mindset is so typical – they’d might as well say “I don’t care what you say as long as I agree with it and it doesn’t offend me, but you’ll never know what offends me until I’m offended and now I’m mad so it’s too late!”

Ever wonder why men die first? – they want to. Anyway that stems from this…

“You should have your tongue ripped out”: the reality of sexist abuse online

No one likes to look like a whiner — particularly a woman writing in male-dominated fields such as politics, economics or computer games. Others are reluctant to give trolls the “satisfaction” of knowing they’re emotionally affected by the abuse or are afraid of incurring more by speaking out.

Then why are you whining if you don’t want to look like a whiner? How something effects you emotionally is no one’s problem but yours! I nor anyone else can be held responsible or liable for how you react to anything – I get so sick and tired of people saying “You made me feel ____!” – Insert any emotion or state of mind, because my response every time is a simple one… ‘I have no control over how you feel or react, you and you alone control that. So don’t try blaming me, put you big girl panties on and STFU.’

This is one of the many problems we have in the world – we’re all suppose to self-regulate in concern of others felling and/or emotional state. When did I become responsible for your feeling? When did anyone become responsible for anyone’s feelings but their own? I’ve heard people say ‘Well you need to watch what you say because you don’t know what events people have suffered in their life and how that may effect them.”

I’ve got some news for you I really don’t care what events you have suffered in your life anymore than you give a shit about event suffered in mine, so I’m not going to tip toe around your emotions because you opted to wear your heart on your sleeve – so you know what… deal with it.

I’m not to saying we toss compassion out the window and just be rude to be rude, but I don’t want to be in a constant state of fake revved up compassion because of some kid said your senior prom dress makes you look fat – I rather people say what’s on their mind instead or running around in the gray haze of political correctness, because the fact are nothing great ever got done without pissing a few people off.

OK the whiners can come back now… I could go one with this rant, but honestly I just really don’t care what these people think… maybe I should sue.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress

17 visitors online now
6 guests, 11 bots, 0 members
Max visitors today: 38 at 02:36 pm UTC
This month: 67 at 05-08-2013 12:05 pm UTC
This year: 95 at 04-19-2013 07:09 pm UTC
All time: 365 at 03-16-2012 03:55 pm UTC

© 2008-2013 The Angry White Guy All Rights Reserved